Saturday, June 13, 2020

Essay on “Andrea Doworkin’s and Sonia Sanchez’s Feminist Theories Similarities and Differences”

Essay on â€Å"Andrea Doworkin’s and Sonia Sanchez’s Feminist Theories: Similarities and Differences† This paper endeavors to compare and contrast two feminists, Andrea Doworkin and Sonia Sanchez, and their theories. Andrea Doworkin was born to secular Jewish parents and raised in Camden, New Jersey. Drawing from her past life experiences, Doworkin rose to become a second wave feminist. She had negative life experiences owing to the sexual assaults she suffered on a number of occasions. As such, Doworkin’s main theme revolves around male violence against women. According to Doworkin, the current society is characterized by males’ supremacy and rape, prostitution, and pornography are solid representations of gender norms. On the other hand, Sonia Sanchez is a renowned poet owing to her contribution in the Back Arts Movement. Sanchez works denounce racism and sexism that she encountered during her early upbringing in a militant black community (Saunders 73). Sanchez works also show her concern with regard to the welfare of the black community, and social justice (Soble 2 41). Although the philosophical theorization of Doworkin writing’s is not clear, her arguments revolve around sexism she finds in the society. Doworkin is determined to erase binary concepts of gender and their oppressive effects (Bennice and Patricia 273). Passivity, self hatred and masochism, are singled out as the main deconstructions of female gender role. According to Doworkin, male supremacy is constructed and reinforced in the society through the sexist structuring of public institutions and private interactions, which illuminate three elements of male supremacy (Brownmiller 40). These elements include rape, pornography, and sexual intercourse. Doworkin analyzes pornography in three different books namely Our Blood, Letters from a War Zone, Woman Hating, and Pornography; male Possessing Women (Bennice and Patricia 270). Amazingly, In Woman Hating, Doworkin had some positive comments on the pornography of the 1960s and early 1970s. She stated â€Å"its graphic depictions and celebration of oral sex and female genitals helped breakdown the barrier to the realization of a full sexuality† (Dworkin 34). However, in Right Wing Women, she argues that in order for an individual to be crowned feminist, one should be anti pornography. The two feminists have a couple of things they share in common. The two authors’ theories aim at protecting the rights of women. The two feminists rose to become radical feminists owing to the challenging experiences they encountered while growing up as young girls. Doworkin’s theory of anti pornography is based on a number of difficult experiences she had while growing up. As such, her main argument aims at denouncing male supremacy in the society, which she argues necessitates female sexual harassment. Sonia Sanchez also draws her motivation from the racism and sexism she faced during her yester years (Dworkin 34). The two feminists also have a number of differences. Doworkin’s theory revolves around denouncing, male supremacy and female sexual harassment. Although Sanchez’s theory denounces female sexual harassment in the society, it also endeavors to fight for the rights of the black community, and social justice. Upon analyzing the two theories, Doworkin’s theory stands out as the most elaborate. Doworkin attempts to explain what her theory entails. According to Doworkin, male supremacy is constructed and reinforced in the society through the sexist structuring of public institutions and private interactions, which illuminate three elements of male supremacy.

Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Writing A Research Paper Conclusion

Writing A Research Paper ConclusionA research paper conclusion needs to be read in such a way that it makes the reader wonder what else is to come. It should leave them with a smile on their face. However, the question is, how do you accomplish this goal? What should you keep in mind when writing your conclusion?The first thing to remember is to create a general outline of the rest of the paper. Make a list of all the topics that you want to cover and the purpose for each one. Organize the points according to how they are related to each other. Make sure that your conclusions do not overlap one another.Next, look at your research and ask yourself what personal qualities would you like to include in your conclusion. These are the qualities that will be displayed in your paper. Be sure to use them in your conclusion as well. After all, they are the ones that make your conclusion stick out.Be careful, however, to make sure that you do not veer too far from the purpose of your paper. Som etimes it might seem appealing to have several short paragraphs regarding your research, but that is not the way to go. When writing a conclusion, the tone you use is what gets the attention of the reader.Be sure to be clear, precise, and concise. The effect that your paper has on the reader must be carefully considered. You may need to adapt your conclusion if it is not clear or does not live up to your expectations.Finally, remember that it is your conclusion that determines whether your paper is read or ignored. If the conclusion is short and your paper is lengthy, it might not be read. Therefore, it is important to think about what the goal of your paper is before you start writing it. These are some tips that you can follow when writing a research paper conclusion. Make sure that you know what your final objective is. This will help ensure that your conclusion is something that will leave the reader thinking.Remember that a research paper conclusion is what separates a good pap er from a bad one. Be sure to be clear, precise, and concise, and use personal qualities as well as general characteristics when writing your paper.